Hove bar blocks cell phone signals and is more social

 

A Sussex landlord built a "Faraday cage" around his pub to block mobile phone signals to encourage face-to-face conversation.

 

 

Steve Taylor has fitted silver foil to the walls and copper wire mesh to the ceiling at Hove's gin barrels.

 

 

He said he was tired of people coming in and not socializing with each other or other people in the building.

 

 

"I saw things gradually getting worse and I thought, 'I want to stop this,'" Mr Taylor told BBC Sussex.

 

 

"I want people to socialize with the people they're with, not with the people they're not with.

 

 

"I made the bold decision not to block the signal with mobile signal jammer, but to do what I could with a Faraday cage to get people talking to each other, and it worked really well, to be honest.

 

 

"I had a lot of copper mesh and I thought,I can put this on the ceiling."

 

 

"I'm looking into whether it blocks the signal, when you put the phone in it, it blocks the signal."

 

 

Mr Taylor plans to set up a mobile phone area outside, similar to the smoking area.

 

 

"Pubs have landlines when calling 999 in an emergency," he said.

 

 

"It's the same as the London Underground - no more dangerous than my pub.

 

 

"The response I got was overwhelming. People loved the fact that they could just take a photo and go out and sign in or check in," he said.

 

 

"I had a complaint from a customer and she got the signal. We moved her to another table."

 

 

Arrested for speeding trap 'jammer'

 

Device stops camera from taking speed readings

 

A motorist in south Wales has become the first person in the UK to be arrested for using an electronic jammer to confuse a speed trap.

 

 

South Wales Police found the driver with a laser diffuser device in his car under a campaign called "Security Camera Collaboration".

 

 

Also known as a wifi blocker, the gadget works by alerting drivers to a laser speed detector and temporarily preventing it from taking speed readings.

 

 

The car was recorded speeding on six separate occasions around Cardiff and the South Wales valleys.

 

 

However, its travel speed cannot be read due to the signal jammer device jamming the detector.

 

 

South Wales Police Sergeant Gary Smart said: "The driver involved has been arrested for obstruction of justice and has admitted the offence."

 

 

"Partners will not tolerate the use of such diffuser devices.

 

 

He added: "Clearly, people using such devices tend to drive without due regard for speed limits and prevent police officers from carrying out their duties."

 

 

There are 33 static speed camera stations and 41 traffic signal stations in the South Wales Police area.

 

 

Another 103 mobile stations and 11 mobile units are also used to catch speeders.

 

 

Complex devices that prevent the camera from reading data quickly can be purchased from specialized websites.

 

 

They work by sending a strong laser signal to a speed detector, which causes a temporary error in the device and prevents a speed reading from being made.

 

 

"While legislation has been passed to make the use of radar diffusers illegal, there is currently no legislation on laser devices," said John Rowling of Security Camera Partners.

 

 

"Although the government is considering this important issue.

 

 

"Using this type of device is extremely dangerous as it puts the safety of other road users at risk by giving drivers a license to drive at inappropriate speeds.

 

 

He added: "I hope this arrest will serve as a clear warning to those using such devices to allow them to drive beyond the speed limit."

 

 

Dewsbury driver who used speed camera jammer jailed

 

A driver who used a laser gps blocker to illegally block the signals of road safety cameras has been jailed.

 

 

Police say Michael Twizell, 58, used a device on the front of his BMW 3 Series to interfere with camera equipment.

 

 

Twizel, from Dewsbury Low Road, was driving the A658 near Harrogate last February when he passed a camera van.

 

 

He was jailed for three months at York Crown Court after pleading guilty to obstructing the course of justice.

 

 

Cameramen detected the wrong code and North Yorkshire Police launched an investigation.

 

 

According to police, Twizel installed jammers on the front of his vehicle to interfere with police camera equipment.

 

 

The latest news and stories from Yorkshire

 

 

After the hearing, Traffic Constable Andy Foss said: "The use of a device capable of interfering with police speed measurements is clearly a very serious matter, as has been demonstrated today."

 

 

He added: "I would advise anyone who might have a similar device installed in a vehicle to consider the consequences and strongly advise them to remove it to avoid future prosecution."

 

 

Twizel was also fined £1,500.

 

 

North Yorkshire driver jailed for using speed camera jammer

 

A driver has been jailed for two months for using a laser jammer to avoid being caught by speed cameras.

 

 

In February 2018, Nicholas Burke, 46, used the device to jam the signal from a police security camera van on the outskirts of York.

 

 

Police estimate his car was traveling over the road speed limit of 60 mph.

 

 

The former car salesman pleaded guilty to perverting justice at York Crown Court.

 

 

A portable jammer installed under the front grille of Burke's car prevented the quick readout.

 

 

Its use activates a code on the camera, indicating to police that an illegal jammer is being used.

 

 

More Yorkshire news

 

• north yorkshire police said burke admitted in an interview that he owned the laser jammer, saying he installed it because he feared points would be deducted from his licence.


• burke, from selby green, north yorkshire, has since quit his job as a ferrari salesman.


• traffic constable andy forth said the jail sentence showed "the courts take a very pessimistic view of people using jammer device".


• "the purpose of our enforcement convoy is to reduce road casualties," he said.


• "as a result, the use of such devices to interfere with speeding enforcement (one of the top four causes of fatal and seriously injured crashes) increases the risk to everyone else using the county's roads and the communities they represent."

 

 

 

 

 

Linking connection problems to signal interference can be difficult. However, if you notice these signs, you may be the target of this attack:

 

Your signal is good, but you can't make a call or send a message. The receiving bar may be lower than usual, but it's not bad enough to stop all communication.

 

 

The router didn't show any problems, but it couldn't get online. Your Internet connection may appear normal even if there is signal interference.

 

 

Don't trust apps that claim to detect interference. Apps that claim to be able to spot interference are often fake and will show false results.

 

 

If you suspect interference, stay away. Most cell phone jammer operate within a limited radius. Therefore, try to leave the area that appears to be affected. If wireless communication is normal, you may fall victim to signal interference.

 

 

Call your service provider. Other root causes can cause wireless communication to fail. Therefore, consult your provider for possible causes.

 

 

What is signal interference? Is it legal?

 

Signal interference overwhelms the target signal frequency and prevents nearby users from sending or receiving data. All devices that transmit or receive wireless signals over a particular frequency are susceptible to interference. Thus, jamming can target Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, and radio communications.

 

 

Because of its dangerous effects, jamming is illegal in most countries. If caught using jamming device to disrupt wireless communications, offenders face hefty fines and jail time.

 

 

In theory, signal interference can help designate phone-free zones, especially in schools. However, in most cases, the use of jamming devices is illegal.

 

 

In France, a man used a multi-band wifi blocker to stop his children from accessing the Internet at night. However, attempts to limit Internet use at home extended to neighbors, causing disruption.

 

 

For the disturbance, the man faces a fine of 30,000 euros and up to six months in prison. Therefore, even seemingly harmless use of interference can land you in hot water with law enforcement agencies.

 

 

How does signal jamming work?

 

Signal jamming is the deliberate disruption of communications by transmitting strong signals and overwhelming frequencies. Depending on its operation, jamming is a DDoS or DoS attack that stops a wireless exchange.

 

 

Also, intentional interference is important, because unconscious interference is interference. The latter occurs when the Wi-Fi signal is weakened by nearby devices using the same frequency.

 

 

A jamming device can be a relatively small device that broadcasts a continuous signal to block other transmissions. Some high-end products can cost thousands of dollars, but there are also some inexpensive devices. The following are the main types of jamming systems:

 

 

Handheld or portable systems may affect smaller areas.

 

 

Fixed signal gps blocker can operate within a larger radius and interfere with a certain frequency range.

 

 

Homemade devices that cover a smaller area may target one or two frequencies.

 

 

Signal jamming as a means of censorship

 

1. Government-ordered disruptions may cause users in specific areas to lose access to the Internet. In other cases, radio broadcasts from other countries may also be unavailable due to interference systems.


2. China has taken signal jamming measures to block radio signals sent by foreign broadcasters.


3. Iran launched satellite jamming to block BBC signals during the presidential election.


4. Russia has used multifunctional devices to disrupt communications in Ukraine.

 

 

Protect yourself from signal interference

 

• In addition to detecting when someone is trying to interfere with your signal, there are a number of prevention methods you can consider.


• First, you can change the Wi-Fi frequency and channel. Most signal jamming devices block the 2.4 GHz frequency. So, by choosing 5 GHz, you can restore your Internet connection.


• For home security systems, you can use tools that use proprietary algorithms that can identify interference. Such programs then alert the owner that someone is trying to interfere with the security system.


• Finally, if you are unable to send a message or call, you can try using a VoIP service. This should help avoid attempts to interfere with radio frequencies.

 

 

 

 

 

A truck driver was arrested on Monday for using a GPS jammer to hide his geographical location from his employer for several weeks, interfering with signals received by civil aviation at Lyon Airport

 

He blurred the path of the truck, as well as the path of the plane at Saint-Exupery Airport. A truck driver was arrested in Olins, south of Lyon, on Monday morning for using a GPS jammers to mask the geographical location of his professional vehicle, several sources with knowledge of the matter confirmed to Le Figaro. The National Radio Frequency Agency (ANFR) conducts 1,800 such incidents every year, and after an investigation, the suspect was arrested by police on the CRS highway. It is the General Directorate of Civil Aviation (DGAC) Lyon Airport that sees its GPS signal being interfered with at the same time every morning, thus issuing an alert. After a month of investigation, the direction finder - a circular radar placed on the roof of an ANFR vehicle - was able to isolate the HGVS travelling at the relevant time and identify their number plates.

 

 

Petty theft and serious crime

 

The Lyon driver told police he was trying to escape his boss's supervision. "This is the most commonly used," Gilles Bregant commented. People move through geolocation enabled corporate devices and for some reason don't want to tell employers where they are. On CNil verified devices, there is a button to suspend geolocation, but the employer knows it has been activated." So there are sometimes good reasons to avoid layered regulation. A few years ago, ANFR spotted a mixing truck in Lyon taking a short detour to deliver concrete to an acquaintance. Again in Marseille, tanker drivers deliver a few litres of petrol to a petrol station that has industrialised the process. Not enough to put the chip in the controller's ear. Except that the station is located in the disturbance zone of Marignane Airport. In addition to these small frauds, the use of signal jammers can also indicate more criminal behavior, "where people believe they are being watched by law enforcement or other gangs, suspect trackers and use jammers to turn them off."

 

 

"It's a very harmful little device," Bregant said, but it can't be used for malicious purposes against airports because GPS is not a landing instrument. "There are specialized instruments on other frequencies that can allow landings," he said. GPS is just used to make the situation more reliable." But these jammers also interfere with planes announcing flight plans because they need to give their position.

 

 

The ANFR director assured that in the context of the war in Ukraine, more powerful phone jammer were used for military purposes, especially to interfere with the operation of drones and the geolocation of artillery fire. "In Moscow, when fears of strikes in Ukraine grow, sometimes taxis can't find their way around."

 

 

How to prevent network eavesdropping attacks

 

A network eavesdropping attack, also known as a network sniffing attack or network snooping attack, occurs when a malicious actor exploits an insecure network connection to steal data during communications.

 

 

Just as someone eavesdrops on a conversation between two people, network eavesdropping involves eavesdropping on conversations on network components, including servers, computers, smartphones, or other connected devices. Some even use popular gps blocker products to prevent eavesdropping.

 

 

How does a cyber-eavesdropping attack work

 

In a network eavesdropping attack, hackers look for weak connections between clients and servers: those that are unencrypted, use outdated devices or software, or have malicious software installed over the network. By exploiting these weak connections, hackers intercept packets passing through the network. Any network, web page, or email traffic that is not encrypted can be read by hackers.

 

 

Hackers often install sniffer programs. Security teams often use these legitimate applications, such as Wireshark, Snort, or tcpdump, to monitor and analyze network traffic to detect problems and vulnerabilities. However, these applications can also be used by malicious actors to find the same vulnerabilities and exploit them.

 

 

Unfortunately, detecting and preventing passive network eavesdropping attacks is extremely difficult, if not impossible, because the network is not compromised or modified. Active attacks are easier to detect, but usually the data has already been intercepted by the time a network change is noticed.

 

 

As with most things in security, prevention is better than cure. Here's an overview of the best ways to prevent cyber-eavesdropping attacks:

 

 

Block your phone

 

The most effective way to prevent eavesdropping is to close all the loopholes that have been opened for hacking. Wave jammers can interfere with the transmission of radio waves between cell phones and cell towers, which can interrupt the transmission process by generating large amounts of stray radio waves. When you turn on the wifi blocker, all phones, WiFi, and GPS stop working. However, the wave jammer interrupts all phone calls, which means normal calls are also blocked. So we have to be careful with these devices. You should consider installing a jammer in your office and turning it on during your most important meetings, because it does work.

 

 

 

 

 

Different countries choose different frequencies for mobile phone signal jammers

 

When you buy jammers, you should choose the signal jamming device according to the country you are in, because the signal frequency of each country is different, so the jammer you choose is also different. In this case, they can choose the signal jammer that suits them, because we know that there are different kinds of signal jammers, such as the EU version of the signal jammer and the US version of the signal jammer.

 

 

Now more and more people hope to obtain a signal blocker that can block signals in different frequency bands simultaneously or separately according to their needs. Now, in order to meet people's needs, more and more people have designed adjustable buttons and combined different jamming frequency bands together in one jammer to achieve their goals.

 

 

The best solution to get rid of GPS device tracking is a GPS jammer

 

Today, GPS tracking devices greatly assist people in orienting themselves. They play an important role in car navigation. They also help people find lost pets and cars. But at the same time, it annoys us that bad guys can learn someone's location through a GPS tracking device installed in a car.

 

 

To get rid of GPS device tracking, the best solution is a GPS jammers that blocks the GPS signal. They are designed to interfere with GPS navigation, tracking and data logging systems. GPS jammers can be used in cars, trucks, vehicles, homes or anywhere you think you are being tracked.

 

 

There is a wealth of information on the internet, and you can easily find out if your state allows you to use a GPS jammer.

 

Secondly, GPS jammers only prevent GPS devices from tracking vehicles, and have no effect on mobile phones.

 

No need to worry about whether your mobile phone can work normally in a car with a GPS jammer installed. Of course, some devices combine GPS jammers and cell phone jammer, which is why you should research that model before buying.

 

 

Third, the price of GPS jammers ranges from tens of fifty dollars to several thousand dollars. The price of a portable GPS jammer is only tens of dollars, while the price of a professional high-power remote-controlled GPS jammer can reach thousands of dollars. You should choose the one that meets your individual needs.

 

 

 

 

 

What is a radio jammer?

 

A jammer is a radio transmitter designed to interfere with, destroy, or block radio communication signals or services. In general, its role is to transmit a stronger signal than a useful signal on the target frequency band. Then the receiver no longer detects a useful signal.

 

 

Jammers often have a wider radius of action than people think or sellers suggest.

 

 

And, users are often overwhelmed by the range of devices, which are never limited to small Spaces, such as rooms or vehicles!

 

 

For example, a jammer used in a classroom to prevent students from using laptops could interfere with mobile phones in an entire community! Similarly, gps blocker used by employees who want to stop being geolocated by their employers may interfere with aircraft flying at 2,000 m or parked at 500 m. The use of jammers constitutes intentional and aggressive interference with the radio spectrum.

 

 

There are many types of jammers, depending on whether or not they can interfere:

 

 

Mobile phone and Internet: GSM, UMTS, LTE;

 

 

Other wireless transmission networks: wifi blocker, wireless LAN RLAN, WiMax;

 

 

Applications such as receiving geo-positioning signals from satellites (GPS, Galileo...) Cameras or wireless alarms...

 

 

A radio jammer usually takes the form of an electronic box with one or more small antennas, depending on the number of frequency bands it can interfere with. In the latter case, it is called multiband.

 

 

Telephone jammers: What are the applicable regulations?

 

The mention of the school phone ban at the start of the 2017 school year, and a few miscellaneous incidents such as GPS jammers blocking Nantes airport last April alerted us to the existence of these devices, making the rendering possible. Electronic communication equipment failed. If these materials exist, who can decide to implement them? Updates to applicable legislation.

 

 

Prohibition principle

 

Article L33-3-1 of the Postal and Electronic Communications Act prohibits the installation, possession and use of any equipment designed to render all types of electronic communications equipment incapable of transmission and reception.

 

 

Failure to comply with this ban is punishable by six months 'imprisonment and a fine of €30,000 (Article L39-1 of the Postal and Electronic Communications Act).

 

 

Immunity from sovereign prerogatives

 

Article L33-3 (2) of the Postal and Electronic Communications Act provides for derogations "for the purposes of public order, defence and national security or public judicial service".

 

 

As a result, France, the army, the General Directorate of External Security, and prison agencies are all authorized to possess and use jammers. According to a report by the National Assembly, deliberate interference is a sovereign prerogative.

 

 

The school has no plans for an extension

 

Installing "radio jammers" in schools has been proposed in a bid to crack down on the inappropriate use of mobile phone jammer during school hours. The State Administration of Education has reflected on the issue. It stresses that such devices are not selective, that it would also involve teachers, and that in the event of an emergency (attack, etc.), it would limit communication with the outside world.

 

 

From a strictly legal point of view, the 2012 ministerial response recalls the prohibition of Article L.33-3-1 of the Postal and Electronic Communications Act and the fact that such use is permitted by way of derogation "for the needs of the public." Order, defence and national security, or judicial public service ". They are not allowed to be used in schools because they are not mentioned in the Restricted Derogation list.

 

 

Specific and time-limited exemptions for performance halls

 

The 2011 Act introducing the ban came into force on 1 February 2012. However, according to Article 57 of the Act, radio installations installed in performance halls can render all types of mobile phones inoperable (transmission and reception). The date of publication of the decree may be retained for five years. Problems with the use of mobile phones in concert halls emerged in the 1990s, and jamming signal technology was effective for a time. That five-year period, which has now expired, was designed to allow theater owners to unload equipment.

 

 

From now on, there are other forms of regulation (messaging, self-regulation, etc.). Moreover, on the contrary, the use of mobile phones must not be prevented, including on these premises, because of terrorist threats.

 

 

 

By comparing these two devices side by side, M 27 and M25 are almost identical. From the installation bracket, CPU, wiring, and interference head, M-27 is no different from its brother. Blinder is ready to use out of the box, including all necessary wiring, external speakers, CPU, and two GPS shielding heads.

 

Overall, the M27 is a high-quality and high-performance wifi blocker

M27 is suitable for small vehicles with a smaller appearance. M47 is used to cover weak points of small vehicles or protect large trucks or SUVs.

 

Installation is almost effortless. By becoming slightly familiar with automotive electronic devices, amateur installers can easily connect the device. All you need is a power supply and a ground wire. It is easy to wire the signal jammers head through a firewall through telephone type connectors, which are small enough to pass through the smallest hole. Then the rest is to install the GPS interceptor head. This is where it's a bit difficult.

 

 

The installation brackets are independent of each other, which means that each side of the jammer head is supported by separate brackets. For normal operation, the jammer head needs to be completely straight and level with the road surface. This means that in order to install the pan tilt correctly, you must find 2 independent and completely horizontal surfaces on the car. If installed on the top of the bumper, this may be easy, but most people do not want to clumsily place two large cell phone jammer heads at the front of the vehicle. It is difficult to complete the correct head installation on many vehicles, which is why most Lens hood users create their own mounting brackets.

 

 

Once the head is installed correctly, M27 has made significant improvements compared to the old version. With a more powerful head and fully upgradeable CPU, this new device is ready for all new laser Radar speed gun developed. In most cases, this device will interfere with the LiDAR all the way to the muzzle. However, Blinder did encounter some interference issues.

 

 

For certain guns, such as the Ultralyte LR-B, occasional malfunctions may occur. Independent testing has shown that vehicles equipped with two gps jammer heads at the front of the vehicle cannot cover high reflective areas such as headlights. This is a particularly undesirable situation, as police officers are often trained to aim their headlights when they are unable to produce instant and fast readings. To solve this problem, a headlight laser protective cover may be needed. Laser veil is a liquid coating applied to headlights. Applying this technology to the headlights will greatly help Blinder achieve better interference effects.

 

 

Another solution is Blinder M47. This is the M27 with two additional interference heads. If users encounter interference when using the M27, two additional heads are very suitable for achieving better results. Two additional jamming heads will enable the vehicle to be bulletproof against most laser Radar speed gun in almost all cases.

 

 

 

Until recently, satellite navigation system outages in populated areas were a rare and sometimes sensational phenomenon that caught everyone's attention on social media and the news. Yet such incidents seem to be becoming the daily norm. With the invasion of the Kremlin region on the night of May 3, the era of "GPS failure" suddenly began (in every sense of the word). The public immediately blamed this on the machinations of "Bandra".

Drivers in central Moscow learn to fool GPS jammers

 

Then there were problems with car navigation and car-sharing services in the city centre. Russian intelligence quickly deployed "phone jammer" to jam GPS/GLONASS signals in the area, effectively jamming the guidance systems of any drone that tried to replicate its early May night adventure. Now, if you rely solely on your smartphone's navigation system, you might mistakenly think that a person is somewhere on the outskirts of Moscow.

 

 

The situation is expected to worsen as the Russian government is seriously considering giving large private and public companies the legal right to use electronic warfare systems to protect their facilities from drone attacks.

 

 

This means that in the near future, navigation "failures" related to satellite signal outages will be observed near important targets such as oil refineries, power plants, defense enterprises and other strategic targets. Of course, beating an industrial-grade electronic warfare station with a traditional smartphone is unlikely.

 

 

However, there are opportunities to mitigate the negative effects on personal navigation. We clarify that this is quite feasible in a noisy metropolis. In small, sparsely populated areas, this may not be necessary, as disorientation is generally less important.

 

 

However, in a large city affected buy jammers, motorists must find alternative "coordinate systems" for their navigation devices. Fortunately, this possibility already exists. Location-based services (LBS) technology has been around for a long time, allowing you to determine a user's geographic location based on signals from cell towers and Wi-Fi routers at known locations.

 

 

In order to eliminate interference when the coordinates are accurately determined, the user must manually turn off the reception of the GPS signal and activate the LBS function in their gadget (if not already enabled). While LBS can't provide the same accuracy as GPS/GLONASS signals in more landmarked urban environments, it can certainly help users get to their destination.

 

 

 

Russian electronic warfare (EW) forces are effectively jamming the GPS signals of Western-supplied equipment for the Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU), often even equipment previously considered invulnerable. This is written by the British edition of The Economist.

 

The Economist declared that Western technology was effective in jamming radio frequency armed forces signals

 

"GPS is operated by the U.S. Space Force and is designed for the military. But the Russians routinely block the positioning systems installed on these weapons, sometimes even on models considered invulnerable, "the July 14 article said.

 

 

The authors explain that GPS satellites' radio signals are weak, which means the system's operation can easily be disrupted by competing noise. But according to a Pentagon report leaked this spring, which was cited by the publication, existing jamming filters do nothing to protect Western weapons in the special operations area.

 

 

It is important to note that there are multiple alternatives to GPS, but each has its drawbacks. It takes years to develop new guidance systems and upgrade existing weapons.

 

 

Earlier on July 7, former US intelligence official Scott Ritter said that the Russian armed forces were able to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the US HIMARS multiple rocket system (MLRS) supplied to Ukraine. He explained that air defense (air defense) and electronic warfare equipment can interfere with the GPS signal of the HIMARS missile, significantly reducing its accuracy. The same can be done with an ATACMS installation.

 

 

Earlier on July 6, Dmitry Rogozin, head of the Czar Wolves military Technical Center, said that the Russian military had removed almost the entire British Storm Shadow cruise missile from the line of contact. He said there was a GPS beacon inside the rocket, but it was blocked by the Russian armed forces. The projectile has been handed over to experts from the military-industrial Complex (OPK) to find an effective way to dispose of this weapon.

 

 

Earlier in the day, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Lt. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said that Russian air defense systems shot down two Ukrainian Su-25 aircraft over the Donetsk People's Republic, intercepted four Storm Shadow missiles and four HIMARS multiple rocket shells, and hit the control center. Three Ukrainian brigades posts.

 

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced on February 24 last year the launch of a special operation to protect the Donbass, which continues. The decision was made against the backdrop of the worsening situation in the region due to shelling by the Ukrainian military.

 

 

 

Philadelphia (CBS) - What is a cell phone jammer? Why don't we all have one?

 

Dean Liptak, a Florida high school teacher turned professional wrestler, has had administrative and legal troubles recently. Imagine telling that person you forgot your science homework. Not for slapping a teen in desperate need of an attitude adjustment to the mat (although one can only imagine the fortitude it would take to not do it on a daily basis). Instead, he found a less aggressive but more illegal way to stop kids from checking their phones in class.

 

 

Liptak brings to schools cell phone jammer, radio frequency transmitters designed to block, jam or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications. The device blocks cell phone signals and prevents teens from using their phones.

 

 

The problem is that it prevents everyone in the area from using their phones, including emergency responders. That's why you need to know that even though you can buy them on the Internet, federal law prohibits the marketing, sale, or use of jammers.

 

Mr Liptak is currently suspended without pay. He may need to find an easier job. Things like using pile drivers, choking bashes, and jumping brain damage to make a living.

 

 

A Florida teacher has been suspended for using signal jammers to prevent students from using their phones in class.

 

 

 

Teacher suspended for jamming mobile phone in classroom

 

Pasco County School Board members on Tuesday approved a five-day suspension without pay for Dean Liptak. Liptak did not dispute the decision.

 

 

Liptak activated the jammers in his Fivay High School classroom between March 31 and April 2, officials said. He later told school district investigators that he never intended to create a problem. He said he believed gps blocker were allowed as long as they were not done for malicious purposes.

 

 

Sheriff Kurt Browning wrote in a letter of reprimand that Liptak may have violated federal law by jamming signals that could interfere with others calling 911 in an emergency.

 

 

 

Washington - After considering how combat might be conducted in many different environments, the U.S. Army is changing its approach to long-range electronic warfare, signals intelligence and cyber systems.

 

The U.S. Army will customize long-range jammer device for the European and Indo-Pacific theater

 

The Land Layer System-Brigade and Above Echelon (TLS-EAB) is intended for use by larger Army formations, including divisions and armies with thousands of troops and extensive firepower. The system is considered a key part of the service's "depth awareness" strategy - the ability to identify, monitor, target and engage adversaries from longer distances with greater precision.

 

 

Mark Kitz, head of the Program Executive Office for Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Sensors (PEO IEW&S), said the Army is "evolving our approach to acquisition," especially for flexibility. For example, the Indo-Pacific region, where the United States could come into conflict with China, and Europe, where the United States could come into conflict with Russia, have very different objectives and terrain.

 

 

"The Indo-Pacific Command looks very different from Africa, very different from anywhere," he said. "We can't just put together a cookie-cutter solution that barely works in that combatant command."

 

 

Defense officials consider China and Russia to be serious threats to national security. Both invest in military science and technology and are believed to be able to impede or defend against U.S. military communications, targeting, and attack.

 

The Army signed separate agreements with Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics Mission Systems in August for the TLS-EAB concept and demonstration. The first phase is valued at $15 million for 11 months. Lockheed and General Dynamics rank among the world's five largest defense contractors by revenue, according to Defense News analysis.

 

 

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates - The CEO of Taiwanese company Tron Future says the system is ready for large-scale deployment, with production rates expected to reach 100 units per month by 2023. The company's anti-drone radar is already in use by the Taiwanese army. As demand increases.

 

 

Supplier says anti-drone radar ready for 'large-scale deployment' in Taiwan

 

Tron Future is only four years old, but its T.Radar Pro technology has already found a wide market in Taiwan, the Middle East and South Asia. The drones with the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar can detect distances of up to 5 kilometers and weigh just 15 kilograms, which is what CEO Yujiu Wang said attracted customers the most.

 

 

"The radar was designed out of the need to build layered defenses in the air to protect Taiwan from the constant threat of different types of Chinese UAVs," Wang said in an interview at the IDEX arms show.

 

 

He explained that its development was guided by four principles: keeping it light and small; Equipped with 4D micro-Doppler function to distinguish multi-rotor drones and birds; Low cost; And performance against small, medium and low-altitude flying targets in urban environments.

 

 

The threat from Chinese drones has increased in recent years. In January 2023, a Chinese military magazine stressed that in the event of war in the Taiwan Strait, unmanned aerial systems would play a vital role in targeted strikes.

 

 

Wang said that at the height of the tensions, deployed radars detected as many as 100 Chinese drones conducting surveillance over Taiwan in one week. Key features of T.Radar Pro include an open architecture for image recognition applications, air traffic management, and interfaces for hard or soft kill countermeasures. It has a power consumption of 250 watts and a maximum signal bandwidth of 30 MHZ.

 

 

Initially, these radars were in service with the Taiwan Army and deployed over key islands, a challenging environment where the movement of waves in the ocean can create false targets.

 

 

Based on growing domestic and international demand, the company expects to produce 100 radars per month in the coming year and is considering opening a second production site in Taiwan. The T.Radar can be sold separately or as part of Tron Future's larger anti-drone system. The complete setup also includes a drone jammer and an interceptor, which the company's website describes as offering "a choice of explosive or non-destructive warheads to handle different situations." The company claims that the system together creates a defensive protective dome with a diameter of 5 kilometers.

 

 

Wang stressed that Taiwan's military does not want to be the first to attack in the face of China, as this could quickly escalate into an all-out war. The air defense platform is designed with this in mind, where each different system represents a logical chain that tries to avoid the use of hard kill countermeasures in the first place.